The Great American Tax Revolt – a brief history

September 27, 2010

The first murmurings seemed to appear in the middle 1970’s.  In 1978, California voters passed Proposition 13, the “People’s Initiative to Limit Property Taxation.”  Prop 13 rolled  back property assessments to their 1975 values, and it restricted annual increases in assessed value to 2% per year – far below the rate of inflation. It also prohibited reassessment for changes in market value except upon new construction or change in ownership.

Prop 13 also required a 2/3 legislative majority to increase tax rates or state revenue, and even required a 2/3 majority vote for all local tax increases.

But the great national “tax revolt” came to fruition during the first presidential term of former California governor Ronald Reagan.  His promotion of  “supply-side economics” was based on the controversial (and unproven) theory that lower marginal tax rates, especially those for the highest incomes, spur economic growth and actually increase government revenue. In 1981, during Reagan’s first year in office, marginal individual income tax rates were cut from 70% to 50%,  They were cut further to 28% in 1988.  From 70% to 28% in just seven years.

Deficits mushroomed.

Faced with huge and growing deficits, President George H. W. Bush famously had to break his promise of  “read my lips – no… new… taxes!” He signed into law tax increases that raised that “supply-side” marginal tax rate back to an astronomical 31%.  Deficits continued to expand.

But the arch-enemy of supply-siders turned out to be Bill Clinton.  The direction changed in 1993, Clinton’s first year in office. After a tie-breaking vote in the Senate by VP Al Gore, Clinton signed a tax increase that raised that all-important marginal tax rate to a breathtaking 39.6%.   Tax-cut advocates predicted gloom and doom because of these ruinously high tax rates – the economy would collapse and grass would grow through the cracks in every Main Street in America.

The deficit began to come down during the Clinton years, while the American economy boomed and the “dot-com” revolution flourished.  But in 1994 Newt Gingrich’s “Republican Revolution” had seized control of Congress from the Democrats for the first time in decades.  Republicans would hold on to unbroken control of Congress for the next twelve years.  They still haven’t forgotten what had brought them to power, and it wasn’t the winning personality of Newt Gingrich or his Contract With America.  It was the backlash against taxes and the promise of a “free lunch” of tax cuts.

Have you checked out California’s state financial picture recently?


But here is the irony.  Republicans still position themselves as the fiscally responsible party, contrasting themselves with the “tax and spend” Democrats.  But after decades of evidence that cuts in the top marginal tax rate produce huge budget deficits, many of the Repubican faithful still believe that “tax cuts pay for themselves,” and that a low top marginal tax rate is a necessary condition of a healthy economy.

Why do they believe this?  Stay tuned for the next installment.

(Watch for my followup to this post in the next few days – to be called “A Tax Cut for All Seasons.”)

– Graychin



  1. The GOPers like to blame “the Libruls” for the California mess. No it was Prop 13.
    Schools and every other public institution are starving. And meanwhile real estate taxes for new buyers are impossible. 1% a year on the sales price. Work that out on a very modest $500,000 house. No wonder thier real-estate market is in the tank.

  2. I see someone believes in Keysianian views for economic recovery.. Good God! LOOK at the STATS today!

    The ‘stimulus’ is NOT working.. even Ben has said this.

    As for California.. they were in a mess since way before PROP 13.. and still are in a mess. They are BANKRUPT… here they want the rest of the states to BAIL them OUT..

    Boxer is nuts! Arnie just feeds the masses.. with blab.. while his state gets flooded with more illegals immigrants. Unbelievable.

    I don’t know of anyone who would want to LIVE out there.. except for a nut..

  3. Yeah CA needs Meg Whitman for governor. Her work history? CEO of the largest fencing outfit in the US – E-Bay.

  4. Speaking of California, how about that idiot Carly Fiorina for US Senate? Named one of “The 20 Worst American CEOs of All Time,” she ramrodded through HP’s disastrous merger with Compaq, was around to oversee its failure, and was fired with HP stock having lost half its value during her reign. Her greatest skill in business was self-promotion. Not much has changed – that’s still the basis of her disastrous venture into politics.

    (The McCain campaign had to stuff a sock in her mouth.)

    Who on earth would prefer her to Boxer?

  5. they are both nuts!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: